bipin ([info]bipin) wrote,
@ 2008-07-17 20:58:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
domo-kun diaries
Ok, y'all forced me.

I thought throwing my icy, oh-no-you-didn't-look contemptuously at you would have scarred you into mending your ways. I was mistaken, dear reader. Apparently, I have to pen an entry called Elevator Etiquette for Everyone Ever, listing rules which cavemen had mastered shortly after they discovered the need to go upstairs. So here goes, people. Listen up. On how to go up.

Rule-1: Do not make small talk with me, Steve. Yeah. 'Steve'. No one else does it, Steve. Not Rahul. Not Carlos. Not Enrique. Not !xobile. Just all you Steves. In any case, even when I say "Yeah! Isn't it?" in reply to your "What a lovely day! It's like 80 degrees today", I'm lying, Steve.
First, because I have no idea how much 80 degrees is in Celsius. I'm not standing there with a vacuous look, mumbling "cee equals eff minus thirty-two into...", while you pretend to be Einstein.
And second, because I think a 'lovely' day is one when it's cloudy, and just a little chilly. With a hint of the impending monsoons. We've taken several helpings of melanin at the buffet, thankyouverymuch - we don't crave for the Sun like your white ass does.


Rule-2: US Intelligence has recently declassified documents which reveal that until now, all elevators were to be programmed with a secret 'sense of urgency' factor: the time it took an elevator to approach a floor was to be inversely proportional to the number of times the call button had been engaged. In mathematically challenged MBA-speak, that simply means that if you engaged an already engaged call-button, by hitting it repeatedly, the elevator was to understand that you weren't kidding around, that you really want to go someplace; that it was to drop every other request and get to your floor super-fast. It was originally meant for secret-agents and fire-fighters and the like. Until .. until it was discovered by magnificent you.

If you think all this sounds rather dubious, let me remind you dear reader, that this belonged to the annals of Truth: the US Intelligence files. Rumour has it that it was filed under 'Where's my elevator: dude, where's my elevator?', alphabetically before 'WMDs gone wild: Iraq's rack'.

So yeah, now that the special urgency factor has been removed from all operating elevators, it's time for you to stop being 'special' too, and resist the urge to pound on the buttons. It has no use anymore. Once engaged, it will make no difference whether you leave it alone or make passionate love to it by the beach-side. Save your hand for other amorous purposes, perhaps.

Rule-3: Do not practice your jabs in the elevator until you've checked to see that there's no little Asian woman in the corner, shivering, and repeatedly hitting the red alarm button.


Rule-4: The only people I love more than the repeat-rambos from Rule-2 are your friendly neighborhood litter-bugs. Aren't they cute, ladies and gentlemen? Leaving us with mementos of their ephemeral stay as they hop from elevator to elevator, spreading the joy of squalor. Candy-wrappers, bits of orange peels, tantalizing bits of crossword puzzles, brake-fluid, little crumbs of donuts for the travel-loving mice, even chewed gum! Oh, I can't decide what I'd rather do more: read 'blog poetry' about unrequited love or endure the excruciating pain of screening out your filth, as my eye surreptitiously darts every so often toward it in morbid disgust.

If ever I meet one of you, I will personally bludgeon you to death with my fists. No, really, I will. Like in Ultimate Cage Fighting. And when you're screaming, I'm going to stuff that piece of gum back into your mouth.
(Editor's note: stringing a bunch of 'power sentences' together because you don't have the ability to coherently connect them together and calling that poetry doesn't make you deep. It makes you bipin-at-fifteen.)


Rule-5: There is some debate among in the Levitating Impropriety-Factor Theorists (LIFT) whether Rule-5 is just an expansion of Rule-4, but I will list it here because I know there are some people who need it explicitly stated. Please leave with everything you came into the elevator with: Rule-4 isn't restricted to solids and liquids. It's an enclosed space, with poor ventilation. 'Nuff said.

Rule-7. Ok, I know I'm sounding like an temperamental Michael Jackson in this post - screechy and child-like (oh the Pun! it burneth mine eye!) Here's a simple one then, to balance things out. The rule usually takes beginners marginally longer to master, but once you learn it, dear reader, you can be all smug and throw disdainful looks at the ignorant, which as we all agree, is the true purpose of life. I'll teach you this rule with the help of an example:
Say you're in the elevator with two other people, who want to go to the 3rd and 9th floor (respectively). You wish to go to the 7th floor. To meet me. I'm on the 7th floor. At home, and at work. Fancy that. But yeah, so you want to go to the 7th floor.

Which button do you press?

For those of you who answered, "ummmnn... 7?", I'm sorry to inform you that you've incurred a severe, debilitating loss in karma. The right answer is "5 and 7". Make them a sequence people! 3, 5, 7, 9! You can't travel with a '3, 7, 9'! And don't tell me unsequenced floors can make a pleasant journey. What are you going to claim next - that Joey and Chandler aren't gay?
Minor squabbles aside, let's move to the next example. For 2 points, which button would you press if the already-engaged buttons were 3 and 6, and you want to go to the 7th floor? Obviously, '3, 6, 7' is a terrible combination.

Before you proceed, dear reader, think.

The answer? Hit '5'. 365 days in a year. Then, when '3' gets off, quickly hit '7' to get the next combination '5, 6, 7'. Awesome! See, this is fun.

Extra credit: You're in the elevator, with Britney Spears. She's hit P1 (penthouse-1). You want to go to the 7th floor (ok, ok, you want to go to the penthouse with her, but Rule-2 prohibits you from hitting an already engaged button, and, in a serendipitous stroke of alliteration, hitting on an already engaged woman). Which button do you press?

This might confuse amateurs - how does one deal with a P1? What sequence do you make? 'P1, 7'? What does that even mean?
Thankfully, after having done this for many years now, I know all the nooks and crannies of this game. The right answer is '2'. See, P1 could only mean 'prime number 1', which of course, is 2. Not 1, but 2.
"You know it's fascinating," I tell Britney, "that 1 isn't considered a prime. Or a composite. The first prime is... no no... has been declared to be 2!". I like to impress the ladies with Math.
She looks up from her vanity mirror, and says "Yeah, how fassssicnating!"

My dreams are shattered: I never thought Britney would be sarcastic. People even claim she wrote a song about hitting something more than once.

I'm sorry baby, it's over between us. I should probably go now, and write some poetry on my blog about our lost love.


PS: In the first two case-studies, if anyone dares ask you why you engaged '5' and didn't get off, explain to them 'high five, of course'. Raising your arm as you make this request is optional.
PS: The observant among you would have noticed that there was no Rule-6. That's because a rule so drenched with floor-7s could only be a Rule-7. This kind of meta-reasoning which, to the untrained (but observant) eye, seems to arbitrarily violate Rule-7 (1,2,3,4,5,7?), is not uncommon. I would encourage you not to argue with me. That's like arguing with Superman about why he won't use the elevator.



(Post a new comment)


[info]purely_narcotic
2008-07-18 06:41 am UTC (link)
Haha!
What happens if/when the 7's in the elevators go missing?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bipin
2008-07-18 03:36 pm UTC (link)
You go to floor 13, of course.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]fugney
2008-07-18 10:01 am UTC (link)
Have you been reading Salman Rushdie?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bipin
2008-07-18 03:36 pm UTC (link)
Whoa!

No, I've never read him - I usually stay clear of writers with a bombastic style. Especially their works of fiction.

But the 'whoa' was because it was just last night when, as a whim, I asked a friend of mine who knows my reading taste well (and who plans to make babies with the man) to suggest a book of his for me. I've yet to pick it up though.

So yes, why did you ask me whether I have been reading him?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]fugney
2008-07-18 03:38 pm UTC (link)
I'm reading Rushdie right now, and it seemed to me that bits of your writing resembled his. Of course, I probably have no idea what I'm talking about, and generally find you much easier to comprehend than Rushdie.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]bipin
2008-07-18 05:50 pm UTC (link)
There are two people crying rivers of tears here: she for comparing him to me; and I, for comparing me to him :)

So, which book of his would you suggest? I was thinking 'Midnight's Children' or 'Shalimar the Clown'.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]fugney
2008-07-19 03:22 am UTC (link)
I'm reading Midnight's Children right now. It's better than Shalimar the clown, which is just a tired political rant. You might want to try Shame though, which is shorter than the either of the two books you mentioned, and much easier to understand. It is also very typical Rushdie - biting sarcasm, a very negative sexual world, female characters who are strong-willed but usually wrong-headed, etc.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2008-07-19 04:05 am UTC (link)
people crying rivers of tears here...I, for comparing me to him
Bombastic. Dramatic. Larger than life. And it's not even fiction. Quiz time: Who's the connection? (Pico Iyer, in this case, is *not* the right answer)

Once you're a seasoned Rushdie fanboy, tread into 'Shalimar the Clown' territory. I'd vote for 'Midnight's Children' (What a master craftsman of worlds Rushdie is in MC! When reading MC, I would rush through it, run out of breath, go back and read it reverently like it were the scriptures) or 'The Ground beneath her feet'. Since we are also looking at books for you that are 'so much easier to understand', 'Haroun and the Sea of Stories' perhaps? That book should have you at the first page- Khattam Shud . If you're looking at Rushdie to explain his take at magical realism, there is always the origin of species a la Rushdie 'Imaginary Homelands'.

From ages ago when I was asked to explain my Rushdie/Marquez/Morrison fascination: It amazes me even more to think that someone could in the crevices of their mind create something so bizarre, something so unreal and surreal that it can literally take your breath away. I stop and wonder in awe at the minutest details rendered so beautifully in prose, the comfort with which two distant-almost unconnected,disconnected-bits come and snuggle together like the yin finally finding its yang, the simplicity with which the story coils into itself, The complexities on which the worlds they create- thrive and yet, how effortlessly they manage to lend it that touch of magic, blowing your mind away just like that. so effortlessly. If there ever would have been a physical effect tantamount to all of that, the flipping of the pages would have hurled me against a wall only to watch the new Genesis unravel itself

- She...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]floopilot
2008-07-19 04:55 am UTC (link)
miss "She": thought I'll share this book-reading experience I had with ya - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ah9PyZNb4F8

No, I am NOT a fan. I like his books.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]floopilot
2008-07-19 04:43 am UTC (link)
lol. I think 'Ground beneath her feet' would suit you better :P

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]bipin
2008-07-19 05:07 am UTC (link)
Yeah, yeah. Be all smarty-pants now, floo. Maybe I'll get back at you by asking you 'So, how is your hubby?'

eeps... just typing out 'hubby' grosses me out

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]floopilot
2008-07-19 02:21 pm UTC (link)
how is your hubby?

doing much better than your (in)significant other :P

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]threefragsleft
2008-07-18 06:11 pm UTC (link)
hahahahaha. nice to see a light-hearted entry for once :)

(Reply to this)


[info]spo0nman
2008-07-19 03:57 am UTC (link)
I have only one question does domo-kun have a rule about sex in elevators?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bipin
2008-07-19 04:00 am UTC (link)
That's the missing Rule sex... errr ... Rule six, I mean.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]anomalizer
2008-07-19 05:44 am UTC (link)
Rule #7 suggests there is a bit of Sheldon in you

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bipin
2008-07-20 05:15 pm UTC (link)
Well, when I saw him with the superman t-shirt, I thought I'd found my separated-at-mela brother. But then, the video shows him dancing way better than me.

The search for my evil twin continues.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ashwinb
2008-07-19 04:54 pm UTC (link)
Me like.

(Reply to this)


[info]vaguelyalive
2008-07-21 07:59 am UTC (link)
CRAAAAAAZY.

*backs away slowly*

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bipin
2008-07-21 07:08 pm UTC (link)
Says the girl who thinks that threating a boy with a rusty knife is flirting with him.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]vaguelyalive
2008-07-22 02:29 am UTC (link)
Wtf. You can't just MAKE STUFF UP!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]bipin
2008-07-22 02:50 am UTC (link)
Ok, ok. Clarifications are in order.

"Says the (gangsta) girl who thinks that threating a boy with a rusty knife is flirting with him."

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]vaguelyalive
2008-07-22 03:47 am UTC (link)
Okay, being gangsta does not involve any knives, rusty or otherwise. It just involves breakin it down wit dem hos.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…